Andi Alpers knows tragedy. After the sudden death of her
ten-year-old brother, she’s watched her family systematically fall apart. Her
mother coped by slipping into a deep, vegetative depression; her father coped by
falling in love with his twenty-five-year-old colleague; and Andi coped by drug
abuse, suicidal thoughts, and music. When she faces possible expulsion from a
prestigious school, her father decides to reenter her life. As a last-ditch
effort to save his family, he checks Andi’s mother into a mental hospital and takes Andi with him
on a business trip to Paris, where he’s supposed to conduct DNA tests on a child’s
heart to see if it belongs to Louis-Charles, the missing son of Louis XVI and
Marie Antoinette.
While in Paris, Andi finds a journal written by Alexandrine
Paradis, a girl her age who lived during the French Revolution. As Andi reads
Alexandrine’s journal, truths about the revolution unfold and reveal the
cruelty performed on the young prince. Drawing parallels between Louis-Charles
and her little brother, Andi slowly finds a new way to cope with her brother’s
death. She starts to make friends, fall in love, and care about living again.
While exploring the catacombs one night, Andi finds herself transported to
1795, and she has one, last chance to save the prince…and herself.
This book needs a prologue. The entire time I read this
novel I felt as though pertinent information was missing. I never developed a
connection with Andi, her brother, or their story. A connection between reader
and characters would be much stronger if the reader had a glimpse of the family
before the tragedy to create perspective.
Andi was supposed to be a musical prodigy writing her senior
thesis on the composer Malherbeau. Although research was necessary to add to
the depth of this novel, it was steeped in unnecessary information that broke
the flow of the plot and dulled the interest of the reader. All of the musical references
and descriptions grew monotonous and made me want to set the book down and not
pick it up again.
Another frustration with the book was the romance between
Virgil and Andi. This entire relationship was forced and artificial, and it
needed to be omitted. I understand that Virgil was supposed to mirror Virgil
from Dante’s Inferno as he led Andi
through the catacombs of self-discovery, but it failed. I despised this
plotline.
Overall, I gave this novel three stars because I loved
learning about the French Revolution. I wish the author had eliminated Andi’s
plotline and focused entirely on Alexandrine, Louis-Charles, and the events of
the French Revolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment